Thursday, July 19, 2007

Flight of the Working Girls 

The Vitter affair prompts me to wonder whether the legalization of prostitution should become a presidential campaign issue. I think so. In light of the damaging revelations surrounding the Vitter affair, and the revelations to come (involving Vitter and others), would we be better off if prostitution were made legal? Should we focus our attention on other matters, and avoid the hypocrisy on display when the feds "throw the book" at the Madams while the johns get off easy? (Erm, perhaps that last part should be rephrased.)

Ruth Marcus of the Wapo doesn't think legalization is the answer. She's repulsed by prostitution, and argues that it demeans and commodifies women. (But what about male ho's?) In an excellent column, she writes:

You could argue that prostitution should be legal in this country, as it is in many others -- that America should get over its hang-ups about sex and that regulating prostitution would protect women from being victimized. I don't buy that, and in any event, I don't see my privacy-advocate colleagues making that case.

One man who has understood the importance of dealing with the demand side [of the prostitution equation] is former New York mayor Rudy Giuliani, who went after prostitution in the city by targeting customers as well as prostitutes. Under "Operation Losing Proposition," Giuliani's police arrested johns and confiscated their cars. He didn't wring his hands over their lost privacy.

So what does Candidate Giuliani say now -- now that his own marital missteps are campaign fodder, and his southern regional chairman is David Vitter? At a town meeting in New Hampshire last week, Giuliani sounded like my fellow columnists. "I believe," he said, "it's a personal issue."

What do other GOP presidential candidates currently think about prostitution? Mitt Romney made a point of saying he's against "perversions" in a recent commercial . He says he wants to clean the ocean of immorality so kids can swim safely, or something like that. It's vague, but seems related to the issue. Perhaps he could get more specific. Is he willing to denounce prostitution (and paying for it) as an immoral perversion? What does Vietnam veteran John McCain think about prostitution? What do the Democrats think?

The D.C. Madam's lawyer says there are 60 escort services like hers in the Washington D.C. area alone. Obviously, this profession will continue to persist over time. Should we just recognize it, and leave it up to the cities and states?

If prostitution is legalized, the goverment can tax it. But they'd also have to regulate it in some ways, and there'd be paperwork and red tape and licenses and fees.... just thinking about all that is enough to make you lose your "boom". But if it becomes a legal career path in some locales, then we can expect prostitution schools of higher learning to open, where advanced techniques and exotic fantasy services could be taught.

---
Here's a link with information on the Canal Street Brothel case. It also has a quick and dirty summary of prostitution's history in New Orleans which I'll reprint:

Prostitution was legalized by city ordinance in 1897, in a confined area called Storyville, near the river and downtown on the site of what came to be the Iberville Housing Project. The area was shut down by the Navy in 1917 since it was too close to the new base and port, so the red light district moved to the French Quarter.

As late as the 1960s, prostitutes kept apartments on the second floor above businesses on Bourbon Street with two balcony lights. A red light meant busy. Green meant open for business.

But a series of police chiefs ran the elicit business off Bourbon Street, most notably Joseph Giarrusso, who became chief in 1960. The clean up the Quarter campaigns paved the way for seedy clubs to be replaced by the gift shops that dominate the Quarter today.

Famous New Orleans trumpeter Al Hirt, who died in 1998, was the most vocal opponent of the anti-prostitution drive, since the ladies and jazz went hand in hand to make the French Quarter and Bourbon Street the tourist draw that fed the local economy.



---
Thx to Medium Jim for the Prostitution School link.

---
* title ref

Labels: , , , ,

10 comments DiggIt! Del.icio.us

10 Comments:

I think the GOP believes that prostitution should remain illegal...for other people, not themselves.

Re: prostitution in the Crescent City, A.J. Liebling touches on that a bit (no pun intended) in The Earl of Louisiana. The book claims that Morrison pushed the gambling and prostitution across the river, putting strip clubs/burlesque shows in their place.

That was well before my time...

By Blogger Michael, at 10:24 AM  

AIDS makes the issue moot. Legalizing it would be a way to kill off young girls who don't have the education or skills to do anything else, and would be pushed into it by necessity or hungry families. The money sure beats what you can get with a college degree. Unfortunately, it's such depressing work that most have to take the edge off with drugs, followed by addiction and no profit.

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 11:04 AM  

"The book claims that Morrison pushed the gambling and prostitution across the river, putting strip clubs/burlesque shows in their place."

I understand the basic point here about DeLesseps' reforms, but take issue with the "across the river" description, because Carlos Marcello's Beverly Club and Southport Hall were huge lavish gambling halls in Metairie/Jefferson.

anon: good points. Although, if it's such a dead end, shouldn't law enforcement folks punish the "demand" side (johns) with equal vigor as the "supply" side (madams/prostitutes)?

By Blogger oyster, at 11:16 AM  

Ack--now you've got me wondering, Oyster. I thought sure the book said "across the river," but now I'll have to go read it again...well, it's an easy and fun read, except that I no longer have a copy. Anyway, maybe it said across the river, maybe across the parish line...or maybe they meant it more symbolic than literal.

Jeffrey might remember--I recall him praising the book a while back. And I guess I'll run down to the liberry before too long to borrow it...

By Blogger Michael, at 12:14 PM  

I used to live in DC - Kessler is a straight shooter, and she takes very little crap from anybody.

By Anonymous blogenfreude, at 12:35 PM  

But if it were legal, we would be able to provide the social services such as counseling, free needles, unionization, the elimination of abusive pimps and madams, etc.

Regarding the article, I wonder if a Judiciary Subpeona can reveal once and for all if Vitter recommended his friend for the interim appointment. Who exchanged what letter with whom in order to staff that position with Letten? And why was dismantling a ring Vitter may have patronized of so much importance? Perhaps it is a bit of a stretch, but something seems suspicious about the timing of it all. Thanks for exhuming that article, Oyster.

By Anonymous pointecoupeedemocrat, at 2:19 PM  

http://www.earthtimes.org/articles/show/news_press_release,142713.shtml

senate ethics complaint filed against Vitter

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 2:35 PM  

Thanks, anonymous.

By Blogger oyster, at 3:25 PM  

pointecoupeedemocrat, what kind of social services unscrew your head after a dozen guys a day want you to enjoy something wierd they won't admit to their wives they want?

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 2:25 AM  

Sorry, but prostitution is inherently exploitative in a way no other (legal) profession is. It might have seemed to some people "convenient" to regulate slavery, since it would have happened anyway, but that didn't make it any less a repugnant institution.

By Blogger Arbitrista, at 2:37 PM